PRP vs GFC: Which is Better for Reducing Hair Fall?

When you notice a consistent hair fall, you will want to do everything to curb or stop it. But you would see results only when you do what’s right. Plasma Rich Platelet or PRP for hair fall and Growth Factor Concentrate or GFC treatment for hair loss are two procedures that have gained fame across the field of dermatology. Both are effective. But GFC vs. PRP hair treatment – which one is better? Let’s find out the answer.

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) uses the patient’s rich blood plasma to stimulate hair follicle growth for himself. PRP for hair fall is a proven treatment. It has helped many people, both males and females regrow hair in a few sessions. The treatment enhances the body’s stem cell and collagen levels, thus helping hair growth.

The process involves drawing blood from the arm. The blood will contain rich plasma to use for your hair. The dermatologists then examine the blood for PRP through a centrifuge. Further, they inject local anesthesia on the scalp and inject an injection containing the PRP treatment into the bald spots.

Some benefits of PRP for hair fall include the following.

• Strengthens the hair
• Increases existing hair’s diameter
• Safe as no cuts or incisions involved
• Non-allergenic, as it uses the patient’s own material
• Darkening and thickening of the hair

The Growth Factor Concentrate procedure involves using the patient’s own blood. It uses a highly concentrated growth factor preparation that dermatologists inject into the patient’s scalp and neck to foster hair growth. It relies on various growth factors from the patient’s blood. They include platelet-derived, epidermal, insulin-like, and vascular endothelial growth factors.

The process involves dermatologists taking around 16 ml of blood. It takes around 50 minutes to an hour to derive the growth factor and prepare the GFC treatment for hair loss. Eventually, the dermatologist will have about 8-9 ml of GFC hair treatment they can inject into the patient’s scalp.

Some benefits of GFC treatment include the following.

• Reduced hair fall
• Thicker and fuller hair in volume
• Benefits people in the early Alopecia stages
• Short-duration treatment – takes only about 30 minutes to complete
• Safe, non-invasive, and no scarring involved
• Sustained hair regrowth of about 75-80 percent

Generalizing whether GFC or PRP is better isn’t possible. Both treatments are beneficial in their own right. Besides, individual suitability also matters when choosing between GFC and PRP treatment. The best way to know the better alternative between GFC and PRP, specifically in your case, is to consult a dermatologist and know what’s right for your condition. It will help ensure safe and effective results.